Voter ID Laws: Necessary or More Likely to Disenfranchise Voters?

As the November election approaches, the arguments for and against strict voter identity laws heat up.

As the election season heats up, so does the debate on voter identity. One side of the issue argues that stringent voter identity laws are necessary so as not to dilute the vote of legitimate voters. The other side argues that the strict controls have the effect of disenfranchising legitimate voters. 

A recent story in the Huffington Post cites examples from both sides of the argument, ultimately claiming that it appears more legitimate votes are disenfranchised than fraudulent ones prevented.

More than two dozen states have some form of ID requirements, and 11 of those passed new rules over the past two years. According to Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp's website, voters are required to show one of several forms of photo ID:

  • Any valid state or federal government issued photo ID, including a free Voter ID Card issued by your county registrar's office or the Georgia Department of Driver Services (DDS)
  • A Georgia Driver's License, even if expired.
  • Valid employee photo ID from any branch, department, agency, or entity of the U.S. Government, Georgia, or any county, municipality, board, authority or other entity of this state.
  • Valid U.S. Passport ID.
  • Valid U.S. Military photo ID.
  • Valid Tribal photo ID.

Republicans have been the driving force behind this, claiming that in previous years convicted felons and the deceased have voted. Democrats and voting rights groups claim the ID laws suppress votes, particularly among the elderly, poor and minorities. These groups tend to lean Democratic.

In each of these cases, the numbers are not particularly high when you look at the big picture. But when you take into account that the 2000 presidential race was decided by a 537-vote margin in Florida, it’s not hard to see why this is such a hot-button issue right now.

What do you think? Are voter ID laws necessary to avoid diluting a genuine vote, or are the laws more likely to disenfranchise a legitimate voter? Tell us in the comments.

Keep up with all the news you care about by subscribing to our free email newsletter, liking us on Facebook and following us on Twitter.

Bob July 15, 2012 at 11:23 PM
What a dumb question. "Are voter ID laws necessary to avoid diluting a genuine vote....? The Republicans are pushing this issue. Republicans never do anything anymore that is good for the country. They only do what is good for their party and the Republican party wants control of the White House more than anything. Just listen to Mitch McConnell who stated that his sole purpose was not to help this country recover from the worst recession in its history but to make sure Obama was a one term president. The rest of his party has followed his lead.
Lynn Hubbard July 16, 2012 at 03:50 PM
Who doesn't have an id? You have to have an ID for EVERYTHING. Having a bank account, going to the doctors office, flying, drinking, sneezing. If you can't or don't drive they have state ID's. No excuses.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »